The veiling measurements were performed near Pa Beta and near Br Gamma as discussed above. Hereafter, the veiling measured at Pa Beta will be referred to by rJ and that measured at Br Gamma by rK.
In 25% of the T Tauri stars observed at J and in 30% of the T Tauri stars observed at K photospheric lines are not identified. These stars are: CW Tau, DG Tau, DL Tau, DR Tau, GW Ori, HL Tau, RW Aur, RY Tau, SU Aur, V1331 Cyg, YY Ori and XZ Tau at J and CW Tau, DI Cep, DR Tau, GW Ori, HL Tau, RW Aur, RY Tau, SU Aur, V1331 Cyg and XZ Tau at K. There are two possible explanations for this. On the one hand the photospheric lines can be masked under a noisy T Tauri star spectrum. On the other hand a T Tauri star's spectrum might be significantly veiled so that the photospheric lines cannot be identified. For the above stars lower limits on the J and K veiling were obtained by veiling the spectrum of an appropriate template star up to a level such that the depth of the photospheric absorption features became comparable to the fluctuations on the T Tauri star's spectrum. The results are presented in Table 4.1. The veiling results obtained for the stars for which the photospheric lines were clearly identified are also presented in Table 4.1.
With the exception of DI Cep, whenever the photospheric spectrum was
identified at one wavelength range (say J) it was also identified at the other
(say K). The K band spectrum of DI Cep does not show any clear
photospheric feature despite photospheric features being clearly present
at J. Having a spectral type G8V, as determined from optical
spectroscopy, the Si 4590.17 cm-1 should be clearly identified in
the K band spectrum. A lower limit of
is obtained for
DI Cep. The J band spectrum is compatible
with the G8V
classification. For BM And it was only possible to obtain a lower limit
on rJ. For this star, one
cannot say that photospheric features are
not present since the blue wing of Mn 7749.92 cm-1 is
clearly seen at the red edge
of the spectrum (see Figure 3.12).
From the data presented in Table 4.1
one arrives to the
conclusion that, within the quoted uncertainties, of the 37 stars for
which the J veiling was measured, 12 stars have values compatible with
. Of the remaining stars
can be excluded at the
level in 12 cases and at the
in 11 cases. The results for the
K veiling imply that, of the 23 stars with
measured, 5 are
compatible with
, in 6
can be excluded at the
level
and in 11 stars
can be excluded at the
level.
In Figure 4.5 rJ is plotted versus rK for the stars that had the veiling determined at both wavelength regions.
Figure 4.5: J veiling (rJ) vs. K veiling
(rK) for the stars for which the two measurements were
possible. The dotted line corresponds to rJ = rK.
Despite the large uncertainties present there is some correlation between rJ and rK. Over-plotted in Figure 4.5 (dotted line) is the line corresponding to rJ = rK. One sees that there is a direct correlation between rJ and rK, with rK growing faster than rJ does.
The histograms of the rJ and rK measurements for the stars for which the veiling could be determined are shown in Figure 4.6. The method used to compute these histograms, as well as the ones presented in the remaining of this work is described in Appendix A.
Figure 4.6: Top panel - the solid line
represents the distribution of the veiling measurements at J for all
stars for which the veiling could be determined. The dotted line
represents the histogram for K7V to M2V stars; Bottom panel - Same as
in the top panel but for veiling measurements at K.
The mean values for the distributions are < rJ > = 0.56
and < rK > = 1.31
and the respective standard deviations are
and
. Although most stars have relatively low J and K
veiling, the distributions clearly have an extended tail towards
higher values of veiling.
The histograms of Figure 4.6 do not take into account the stars for which only lower limits where obtained. The lower limits tend to be relatively high, implying that the true distributions are actually enhanced for higher values of veiling when compared to those shown in Figure 4.6. This is shown in Figure 4.7, where the dashed bins, representing the distribution of the lower limits on the veiling, are plotted over the distributions of the veiling measurements (solid lines).
The lowest values of the upper limits occur for early type stars, like GW Ori, RW Aur and RY Tau, for which the photospheric lines in the template stars are themselves not very strong, making the veiling measurements difficult (note that the strong Magnesium feature is, for the T Tauri \ stars, out of the observed wavelength region due to their radial velocities) or for stars with low signal-to-noise ratio, like XZ Tau. The un-identification of photospheric features in the spectra of some T Tauri tends therefore to reflect high veiling states for the near infrared wavelength region.
Figure 4.7: Top panel - the
solid line represents the distribution of the veiling measurements at
J for all stars for which the veiling could be determined. The dashed line
represents the contribution to the histogram of the stars for which only
lower limitsfor the veiling were obtained; Bottom panel - Same as
in the top panel but for veiling measurements at K.
Furthermore, magnetic fields tend to broaden photospheric lines and
thence increase
their EW, which is proportional to the magnetic sensitivity
, where
is the wavelength of the line and
is the efective Landé
factor [Guenther et al. 1998]. As
discussed by Guenther et al. (1998), such an increase in
the EW might result in an underestimation of the measured veiling for
T Tauri
stars if the Landé factor of the photospheric lines used for
the veiling determination is not zero. The Landé factors for the
photospheric lines used for the veiling determination in this work are
[Ruedi et al. 1995]: at J, 0.67 for Ti
7791.23 cm-1, 1.08 for
Ti 7781.77 cm-1 and 1.50 for Fe 7761.99 cm-1; at K
1.25 for Ti 4589.50 cm-1. Therefore, the results presented
above for the veiling underestimate the true veiling if there are
magnetic fields, as expected.