- ...quasi-Keplerian
- 'Quasi-Keplerian' meaning
that velocities in the disk are mainly azimuthal, following Kepler's
orbits, with a small radial
component.
- ...grating
- The
resolving powers shown here are for the short camera and one pixel wide
slit.
- ...file
- Flat Field and Arc observations will be defined
below.
- ...sampling
- Please refer to Section
2.3.3 for an explanation of the sampling
procedure.
- ...achieved
- It will become apparent
in the section on data reduction why the pattern object-sky-sky-object
was chosen.
- ...source
- This is especially important at infrared
wavelengths were the background comes from virtually everywhere and can
be stronger than the target source. Note that a black body at room
temperature, say 300 K, has its peak intensity in the infrared.
- ...source
- All data presented in this work are
from point sources.
- ...image
- For all the data
presented here the negative beam can be found 10 rows above the positive
beam.
- ...detrimental
- OH emission lines have
been eliminated from the spectra when subtracting the background
contribution. As we will see below steps will be taken in order to
remove the telluric absorption lines as well.
- ...task
- Using the same technique as that used to de-ripple would
do. IRFLAT is actually used by the CGS4DR deripple_spectrum task.
- ...star
- Both the cross correlation function and the
auto correlation
function are non normalized.
- ...data
- That is to say, using the J and K magnitudes in Strom et
al. and following Meyer et al.
- ...respectively
- These are the mean uncertainties in the observed
514#514's and 515#515's.
- ...K
- recall that if the T Tauri
stars studied here have magnetic fields, as
expected, the values found for the veiling underestimate the true
veiling.
- ...one
- This is a good aproximation, as long
as the the chosen interval is small enough.
- ...quantities
- Valenti et al. valentietal93's accretion
rates are in good agreement with those found by Gullbring et al.
gulbring and the newest estimation is therefore
preferred. Hartigan et al.'s accretion rates differ from the former by
about one order of magnitude.
Daniel Folha
Fri Aug 28 11:53:21 BST 1998